Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [geomesa-users] Storm Ingest

Hi Nathan,

Have you considered just using anchoring and acknowledgements to track your tuples? You don't need trident for the basics - you might not get 'exactly once', but it should be closer. See:

http://storm.apache.org/releases/1.0.1/Guaranteeing-message-processing.html

Also, in general re-writing a feature to GeoMesa will not cause any problems as long as the feature has not changed. So you should be fine re-writing the occasional feature. Just make sure that you use the geotools hint to set the feature ID to your provided value, otherwise GeoMesa will generate a new feature ID and you will get duplicate entries. See:

http://docs.geotools.org/latest/javadocs/org/geotools/factory/Hints.html#USE_PROVIDED_FID
https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/allow-inserts-to-use-existing-feature-id

Thanks,

Emilio

On 06/03/2016 03:15 PM, Nathan Mercer wrote:

Hi there,

 

I have tried implementing the Storm ingest example and I was successful. I was also able to apply it to my own data which is polygons stored in Shapefiles.

 

However, using Storm and Kafka you only get at least once guarantee which means you may ingest data more than once. And I have actually seen this happen with my implementation.

 

Apparently using Storm’s Trident you are able to get exactly once guarantee. But I have tried and tried and cannot get Trident working. None of the examples I have found online for Trident have a similar use case.

 

Has anybody been able to implement Trident for ingest? Does it even make sense?

 

Thanks,

 

Nathan Mercer


  ­­  

_______________________________________________
geomesa-users mailing list
geomesa-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/geomesa-users


Back to the top